"Increasing export duties
on iron ore may reduce domestic steel prices in the short
run, but this may set in motion another round of inflationary
pressure for the metal sector"
"In
its worst form, the 'inflationary expectations' can lead to
an 'inflationary spiral'"
"Global
demand for iron ore has been caused by China's steel growth."
"The
incremental capacity addition in China each year is more than
India's total steel capacity."
"Price
of steel in the world is not impacted by the cost structure
of the marginal Indian steel industry but by the marginal
cost structure of the Chinese steel industry, which is not
only the largest, but also relatively high on the cost curve"
"Hence,
policies to reduce inflation will have to factor in the impact
not only on the domestic segment, but on the world cost structure
(and world inflationary expectations) also."
|
|
Increasing
export duties on iron ore may reduce domestic steel prices in
the short run, but this may set in motion another round of inflationary
pressure for the metal sector, says Navin Vohra
AS
per the chaos theory, a small butterfly flapping its wings in
the Pacific Ocean impacts the monsoons season in India. Certainly,
policy makers in the world do not believe in this theory, otherwise
they would not have been following policies of using export
duties to control inflation. In a globalised world, these policies
may actually help push inflation to other countries, which,
after a lag, comes back to haunt you.
To
understand this better, one has to appreciate the role of 'inflationary
expectations' in causing inflation. In its simplest form, the
theory runs like this: Suppose employees expect inflation to
be high next year. To protect their interest in such a scenario,
they would demand an increase in wage. Similarly, manufacturers
are likely to be faced with the demand for increase in wage,
which they will factor in the form of increase in product pricing
from their customers. Thus, each segment of the economy will
modify their behaviour to factor in the expected inflation.
Sooner than later, this expectation will lead to a self fulfilling
prophecy and inflation will actually shoot up. In its
worst form, the 'inflationary expectations' can lead to an 'inflationary
spiral'. The monetarist solution to break the inflationary
expectation is for a central bank/monetary authority to build
strong credibility that they would not let inflation to rise.
This is typically done by building specific inflation targets
for central bankers, and ensuring independence of central bankers.
One of the key reasons for a fairly long period of low inflation
in the world (prior to the current boom) was the strong credibility
built by central bankers over the years.
Now,
let us look at the scenario in iron ore, and consequently in
steel. Global demand for iron ore has been caused by
China's steel growth. China now accounts for more than
400 million tonnes of steel production, about 40% of the total
world production. The incremental capacity addition
in China each year is more than India's total steel capacity.
The result is an ever increasing requirement for imported iron
ore, as China is very deficient in the mineral. What makes the
iron ore sector more interesting is the significant consolidation
among the suppliers. Between themselves, Vale (Brazil), BHP
Billiton (Anglo-Australian) and Rio Tinto (Australian) account
for more than 75% of the seaborne iron ore supply. The joker
in the pack is the Indian iron ore supply (spread over many
small suppliers) which account for about 90-100 million tonnes
- not a small amount in the 700-million-tonne industry.
Now,
let's look at the price behaviour over the last few years. Iron
ore prices, like other metals, have been steadily rising in
the last few years. This is simply on account of demand-supply
timing mismatch. While demand from China increased linearly,
supply increase could happen only with a lag, as it involved
large mining, railway and port infrastructure to come up, which
has a long set up period. Thus, prices increased substantially
in 2004 and 2005, but the increases started tapering off thereafter,
with price increases in 2005-06 and 2006-07 being only 10% and
5%, respectively. There was genuine expectation in late 2006
and early 2007 that prices would start declining in the near
future from their peaks.
However,
in 2007, two unusual events happened. One, for the first time,
the Indian government imposed an export duty on iron ore. More
than the quantum of increase, it sent a directional signal to
the Chinese. Second, there were floods in Australia, which impacted
the supply of iron ore. So, by the end of 2007, if you were
a Chinese steel maker looking to increase your import of iron
ore, the scenario looked grim. On the one hand were the three
giants, who had suffered infrastructure bottlenecks and production
shortages, and obviously demand a higher price. On the other
hand, was the Indian supply, of which you could not be sure
of the costs (as it could change significantly based on export
duties to be announced in the Budget) or even the quantum of
supply (what if there was an export ban from India, which always
looks like a very real possibility). Thus, you braced yourself
for a high cost increase in your raw materials (which happened)
and as much as possible, increase the price of steel (which
also happened). The price of iron ore increased dramatically,
pushing up the price of steel.
Why
should the travails of a Chinese steel producer be of any importance
to anybody in India? Because the price of steel in the
world is not impacted by the cost structure of the marginal
Indian steel industry but by the marginal cost structure of
the Chinese steel industry, which is not only the largest, but
also relatively high on the cost curve (and as basic
micro economics teaches us, equilibrium price is achieved where
price equals the marginal cost of the equilibrium output). In
the long term, it is not possible for the price of steel in
India to diverge from the world prices - finally the prices
will have to catch up. By increasing export duties now, the
policy makers may certainly help reduce the domestic steel price
in the short term. However, there is a fair chance that it may
have set in motion another round of inflationary expectations
for the metal industry.
To
conclude, the world (of steel) is now very globalised and is
difficult to keep a domestic industry insulated. Hence,
policies to reduce inflation will have to factor in the impact
not only on the domestic segment, but on the world cost structure
(and world inflationary expectations) also.
(Source:
- Economic Times)
|